 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |

AMETEK SCP has successfully managed numerous projects varying in degrees of complexity for both military and commercial customers. Each project is controlled within the ISO 9001 quality plan and specifically detailed to meet the customer requirements.
Project Management Organization
The Project Management Organization (PMO) has been established to supply the leadership and to perform the control and task monitoring activity needed to direct the efficient performance of the production contract. The AMETEK SCP' PMO is organized to provide consistent and efficient project direction; it is staffed with experienced personnel and draws heavily upon demonstrated experience and related project management experience. Task responsibility assignments within the AMETEK SCP' PMO provide clean lines of control, reporting, and direction. The AMETEK SCP' PMO is structured with emphasis in areas of design/development, manufacturing, test and evaluation, field support, CM/ILS support, scheduling and cost management. The following positions fill the roles of the AMETEK SCP' PMO:
- Project Manager
- Technical Project Manager
- Production Manager
- Quality Manager
- CM/ILS Manager
- Field Support Manager
- Financial Staff
Project Management Control
Institution of tight project control requires close and effective communications. To guarantee effective communication, a straightforward system of problem reporting and resolution is established. The central element in this system is the weekly staff meeting. Each PMO staff member who, presents status, reports problems, and proposes solutions to problem areas attends this meeting.
The weekly staff meeting is intended to provide updates on all situations to the Project Manager and to others, but it is not considered a substitute for personal communication between staff members. All problems, which require crossing lines of responsibility, are assigned actions by the Project Manager at the weekly meeting, if not resolved prior to that meeting.
In addition to and in support of weekly meetings, weekly status reports are compiled and issued. These reports are originated by responsible engineers and managers and include such items as task progress, weekly costs, material shortages, subcontract status, and monthly cost/schedule status reports. Imposition of the AMETEK SCP' Cost/Schedule Control System disciplines creates the need for detailed monthly analyses of task status and costs along with monthly projections of progress and analysis of significant variance from projections. Generation of this data is in the form of the monthly Cost Performance Report (CPR).
In addition to internal reports and status meetings, which ensure day-to-day control over program activities, a series of formal reports and reviews are scheduled to provide the customer with insight into progress of all project activity. Monthly progress reports are provided which detail status of design and development efforts, test results, status of deliverable data and related activity. The CPR is issued monthly to provide cost and schedule status of each task. Program reviews are scheduled at intervals, at which all status information, technical matters, and task progress is presented.
The combination of informal communication, regular status reviews, formal reports and direct lines of reporting within the project management structure and with team leaders, guarantees an effective measure of project control.
|
AMETEK SCP has a complement of design engineers that can support the simplest design to the design of a completely integrated system. Design efforts that may be employed to support the installation of cables and harnesses can include: foundations, equipments, and racks; 2D and 3D mockups; special tools, jigs, and fixtures; weight and moment calculations; power requirements and shock envelope considerations.
|
|
Systems Approach to Connectivity Design
Responsible for the technical direction of all development work. The systems engineering team generates hardware specifications and provides technical leadership and engineering management for all engineering and development activities and determines and applies system acceptance requirements. Their responsibilities encompass all phases of system development from concept formulation, systems analysis, design and development to equipment integration and test installation and instrumentation. By providing an end to end connectivity solution in parallel to system design, we can optimize the resultant product design in terms of delivery schedule, product cost, and connectivity performance.
Design Engineering Group
Responsible for equipment design, component selection, mechanical design, packaging equipment, interconnection, reliability and maintainability, safety, standards and configuration control. Technical personnel provide conceptual designs, participate in design reviews, analyses and trade-offs. They review and oversee related drafting and documentation preparation; develop, test, and evaluate equipment; support system-level and pre-production testing; and perform failure modes, effects and critical analyses.
The engineering group is structured to meet the specific requirements of the customers project. Engineering tasks provide the basis for engineering development through the detailed design, fabrication and testing phases of the program. Specifically, these tasks address the methods for defining system design including generation of specifications (when required), system tradeoff studies, and supporting technical data. Engineering continues to refine the design by translating requirements into hardware specifications, interface definitions, and other design requirements. Engineering reviews the performance specification, under the design definition phase. This specification is the basis for all detail designs for hardware and subsequent reviews. This approach provides specifications for meaningful design and design review tools and also permits specification development by a joint engineering and hardware design team that maintains continuity with the concept design activity.
Process Engineering Group
The development of new fabrication methods and process controls is key to continuous improvement and long-term cost reduction efforts. Our engineering services does not just cover design, but can also extend to examining particular processes and process controls to reduce defects, enhance reliability, and reduce costs associated with a particular design, without necessarily altering the design specification itself. Also, our process engineering applies not just to internal manufacturing, but also field installation work. We use our process engineering group to create detailed processes and procedures for technicians in the field (both our own, and our customers’).
System Trade-Off Studies
Several specific system level trade-off studies are being conducted during the development phase to minimize areas of risk and optimize design. These studies include but are not limited to, the following:
- Investigation of connector mold angles
- Investigation of requirements for cable
- Investigation of optimal connector layout
- Determination assembly cable lengths
Analysis Tools and Methods
All technical data generated is entered in a centralized data bank maintained by the CM/ILS Manager. Technical data consists of the following type of material:
- Technical memos
- Design memos
- Results of computer simulation and analysis
- Design Review results and action
- Results of trade-off analysis
- Contract data requirements
- Finite Element Analysis
- Formal/Informal Test Reports
Personnel
The engineering group is staffed by personnel having prior experience in mechanical, electrical and fiber optic design for both military programs and commercial related projects. Personnel data forms of the key people who have been assigned leadership responsibilities are available upon request. As the planning stage of this project proceeds, changes and the addition of personnel may become appropriate. In as much as project plans and controls are designed to complement the interrelations and aptitudes of its key people, such personnel changes are minimized.
Reliability
All AMETEK SCP designs are evaluated to ensure that the best reliability design features are incorporated. Such features include selection of high reliability components and materials, built-in sparing, and N + 1 redundancy. Formal and informal design reviews are used to assess the status of the design, performance, and reliability requirements.
Maintainability
All AMETEK SCP' designs are evaluated to ensure the maintainability characteristics of the equipment will meet the requirements of the performance specification.
A detailed maintenance concept/philosophy is first generated, to identify what, how, and which level maintenance will be performed, and the tasks to be supported at each maintenance level. Maintenance requirements and tasks are defined for preventive maintenance, corrective maintenance, and calibration required at each maintenance level to achieve, restore, and maintain operational capability of the equipment.
Maintainability design reviews will be conducted both informally and formally throughout the design phase of each project. Informal design reviews are performed frequently and as design information becomes available. By maintaining a liaison with the appropriate design, and system engineers, changes or corrections can be efficiently implemented. Formal design includes the Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and the Critical Design Review (CDR), as well as numerous in-house design reviews.
Design-To-Cost
AMETEK SCP has integrated a design-to-cost methodology into its engineering effort. Our DTC program allows production cost to be treated as a parameter equal in importance to performance and schedule. When system trade-off studies are evaluated, DTC considerations are included.
Project Planning, Design and Milestone Review
Project Planning and Milestone Reviews are part of our normal business process. Design reviews are performed in accordance with MIL-STD-1521B, Appendix D, Preliminary Design Review, and Appendix E, Critical Design Review. In addition, special design reviews are held when significant reliability or performance problems are identified. Special design reviews may be called by the customer or by AMETEK SCP.
AMETEK SCP's quality and testing systems are second to none, building on decades of experience in both the commercial and military arenas.
Quality Assurance
Quality assurance programs are developed utilizing in-place, government-approved, quality system procedures which are fully compliant with ISO 9002. The following paragraphs present an overview of the quality assurance effort at AMETEK SCP . Major tasks to be accomplished by the quality assurance program include:
- Initial Quality Planning
- Preparation of Quality Program Plan
- Acceptance of Purchased Equipment
- Manufacturing Control
- Control of test programs
|
 |
Quality Assurance has primary and direct management responsibility for pre-production and limited production programs for which system integration and acceptance tests are conducted in the AMETEK SCP facility. Quality Assurance personnel also impact the design effort though the attendance of informal and formal design reviews throughout the program.
The Quality Assurance engineer is responsible for initial quality planning and for coordinating the accomplishment of all associated tasks. For the contract, overall management control is exercised through the Quality Program Plan. Satisfactory accomplishments of all tasks not under direct control of the Quality Assurance Engineer is verified by data review and/or periodic audits.
Quality Program Management
To accomplish the Quality Project responsibility, the customers Contract Manager in conjunction with Engineering and Quality Assurance identifies the major quality tasks to be performed in compliance with contractual requirements, division policy and procedures, and otherwise as required in support of the development program. The Project Manager assigns functional responsibility for the performance of these tasks, and establishes schedules and budgets. The method of accomplishing these tasks are then formalized in the Quality Program Plan which will be prepared by the Quality Assurance functional organization.
To ensure cooperation and communication across functional lines, the Quality Assurance Manager is assigned with single point responsibility for verification of successful implementation of the Quality Program. He is responsible for quality status reporting to Program and Product Assurance Management. Throughout the contract, the Quality Assurance Manager maintains cognizance of program activities and quality status. As related to the project, his primary responsibilities include assurance of uniform implementation of company policy, procedures and standards; provisioning of resources including personnel, equipment and facilities to accomplish quality tasks; and independent assessment of quality. The Quality Assurance Manager has the authority to arbitrate unresolved quality issues and to stop production, or suspend shipment of a product which does not meet contractual requirements or company standards.
Engineering Quality Assurance
 |
|
AMETEK SCP places major emphasis on problem avoidance, early problem detection, and on positive action to correct conditions adverse to product quality. During development programs, hardware quality specialists within the Engineering Group are responsible for preparation of quality program plans and for active participation in all design review and test activity. Their primary objective is to ensure the adequacy of design specifications regarding quality provisions, effectiveness and completeness of test programs, and finally, for proper identification and disposition of all detected non-conformances. During the manufacturing phase, the assigned hardware quality specialist will interface with all manufacturing functions to ensure that design quality provisions are fully understood and adequately covered. |
Manufacturing Quality Assurance
All products manufactured within the AMETEK SCP facility are to uniform quality standards under the control of the company per the ISO 9001 Quality Program. Purchasing, manufacturing, and test operations will be performed in accordance with established procedures under the surveillance and control of the Manufacturing Quality Assurance organization.
AMETEK SCP brings over 30 years experience in manufacturing of commercial and military underwater connectors having designed and manufactured a wide variety of underwater connectors and associated hardware. These range from the simplest rubber-molded single pin connectors to state-of-the-art electrical, optical and hybrid electro-optical connectors for extreme underwater environments.
AMETEK SCP has been providing quality products to both Military and Commercial customers for the past three decades. In this time numerous changes have occurred in the connector and cable industries. AMETEK SCP has also made numerous changes to keep delivering quality products to all customers. AMETEK SCP quality assurance program was developed to meet DOD requirements as expressed in MIL-I-45208 and MIL-I-9858A and is compliant with ISO 9001 requirements. The US NAVY and many of our government contractor customers perform quality assessments at the AMETEK SCP facility in Westerly Rhode Island at various intervals. AMETEK SCP is a qualified source for LEVEL 1 SUBSAFE Hull Inserts and Electrical Hull Penetrators, which requires a rigorous quality program to retain this certification. The same rigorous quality plan will be enforced to ensure the highest quality cable assemblies are provided to customer in support of their project.
Testing
 |
|
The accuracy of any test program is a direct result of the management attention, technical competence, and effort placed upon this task. Each test plan is a living document that must have the flexibility to change as the system evolves through its life cycle. A test program must not only be capable of determining production accuracy, and performance specification compliance, but it must also provide critical data needed to determine the need for upgrades. To accomplish this goal the testing process must provide clearly defined and measurable data reflective of system design operational characteristics. Additionally, the procedure must be formatted to ensure speed of test performance, quality of data gathering, and ease of use by the technician. We will utilize our extensive experience gained through years of system tests to ensure consistently exceptional test data systems are generated, maintained, revised and improved throughout the life cycle of cable system. |
- Accelerated life aspects of the integrity program plan
- Durability/hydrostatic pressure cycling design analysis procedures
- Test failure analysis and corrective action report (TFCAR) system
- Design analysis procedures to assure meeting the Specification requirements
- Methods for satisfying the mating and de-mating requirements
- Analysis, test and inspection methods to assure achievement of the interchangeability requirements
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |